Shipping air is one of the most expensive inefficiencies in e-commerce. The challenge is fitting, say, a patio furniture set into a box that minimizes volumetric price in transit while maintaining a configuration that the end customer can assemble without incident.
Solving that challenge reveals the inherent tension in DTC packaging and logistics: Cutting freight costs — by creating tighter product configurations or higher cube utilization — can increase packaging complexity and cost. Cutting packaging costs — using standard boxes, or fully assembled goods— can mean higher freight costs.
But in times of market volatility, solving that challenge is the key to surviving and positioning businesses for long-term success.
The Signals to Watch
The signs of a tightening market are clear: Rising fuel prices. Tightening freight capacity. Climbing resin costs. Lead time expansion. Increasing costs for raw material inputs.
Other indicators are emerging now, like slower payment cycles across suppliers and softer end-market demand in sectors like CPG and industrial manufacturing.
For procurement leaders managing transportation and packaging spend, the shift is immediate, and it’s accelerating.
The Opportunity to Seize
It’s a challenging environment, but it’s also an opportunity for smart organizations to create immediate and long-term cost savings.
In many large organizations, packaging and transportation strategies often operate in silos, seeking efficiencies independently and without coordination.
That’s a problem in stable markets. But in volatile markets, the lack of coordination becomes a huge liability.
Packaging decisions directly influence freight considerations like freight classification, load efficiency, damage claims and mode selection.
Similarly, transportation decisions affect packaging requirements, from material selection to design specifications.
When packaging decisions reduce cube efficiency or increase shipment size, freight capacity is effectively constrained and costs rise. And in a freight market with rising pricing, that cost increase becomes harder to bear.
But an integrated freight and packaging strategy allows organizations to realize cost savings and thrive in a challenging environment.
An Integrated Approach
Procurement teams that are outperforming in the current environment are taking that integrated approach.
They’re using tools that provide real-time visibility into both packaging inputs and freight markets and proactively managing last year’s NMFC reclassification to avoid costly reclassification surprises. They’re focusing on total delivered cost rather than isolated category savings.
And by considering packaging and freight together, they’re making coordinated trade-offs between packaging design and freight cost.
Turning Market Pressure Into Advantage
When everyone is looking for ways to drive costs out of the system, the organizations that win are those that create systems that consider freight and packaging as partners rather than independent cost centers.
The potential pay off is significant. A major animal-health products company, for example, realized more than $1 million of annual cost savings by optimizing box dimensions across its national distribution network.
The challenge is execution.
That’s where external benchmarks, supplier networks, and integrated analytics can accelerate progress.
Procure Analytics, for example, works with businesses to connect these traditionally siloed areas — helping procurement teams align packaging decisions with freight outcomes, improve visibility, and secure advantage in tightening markets.
In this environment, organizations that integrate packaging and freight decisions will be better positioned to control costs in the short-term and, in the long-term, create a lasting strategic advantage.
- CATEGORIES
- Uncategorized